Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] NT synchronization primitive driver
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2024-01-24 12:29:32
Also in:
lkml
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2024-01-24 12:29:32
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 07:37:01PM -0600, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 January 2024 18:59:35 CST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:40:19PM -0600, Elizabeth Figura wrote:quoted
== Patches == This is the first part of a 32-patch series. The series comprises 17 patches which contain the actual implementation, 13 which provide self-tests, 1 to update the MAINTAINERS file, and 1 to add API documentation.32 patches? I only see 9 here, why not submit them all?Because Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst makes a point of asking people not to submit large patch series (and it matches the expectation of other projects I've worked with—that patches would be submitted and reviewed a few at a time). I suppose I've misunderstood that advice, though.
32 patches isn't all that "large", we can handle that easily :) 100+ patches is large, I guess it all depends, so I can understand the confusion. You need to send us enough for us to be able to understand and review the code, this was a bit short for that.
I'll resend with the entire series. Sorry for the noise.
Ptches are NOT noise, we want to see them! thanks, greg k-h