Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2023-12-05

Re: [EXT] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Node migration between memory tiers

From: Huang, Ying <hidden>
Date: 2023-12-05 09:14:53
Also in: linux-cxl, linux-mm, lkml

Srinivasulu Thanneeru [off-list ref] writes:
On 12/4/2023 9:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
quoted
CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL. Do not click links or open attachments
unless you recognize the sender and were expecting this message.
On Fri 01-12-23 03:34:20, sthanneeru.opensrc@micron.com wrote:
quoted
From: Srinivasulu Thanneeru <redacted>

The memory tiers feature allows nodes with similar memory types
or performance characteristics to be grouped together in a
memory tier. However, there is currently no provision for
moving a node from one tier to another on demand.
Could you expand on why this is really needed/necessary? What is the
actual usecase?
Hi Michal Hock,

Following two use-cases we have observed.
1. It is not accurate to group similar memory types in the same tier,
   because even similar memory types may have different speed grades.

2. Some systems boots up with CXL devices and DRAM on the same
memory-tier, we need a way to move the CXL nodes to the correct tier
from the user space.
The case 2 reminds me a RFC before as follows,

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20221027065925.476955-1-ying.huang@intel.com/ (local)

The basic idea behind is that do we really need to put NUMA nodes with
different performance metrics in one memory tier?  Are there use cases?
Will we have a system with so many different types of memory?

As in your case, you don't want to put DRAM and CXL memory in one memory
tier.  Do you think we will need to put two types of memory in one
memory tier?

--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help