On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 04:48:04PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:

On 9/6/2023 4:22 PM, Paul Moore wrote:

quoted

On Aug 28, 2023 Casey Schaufler [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Create a system call lsm_get_self_attr() to provide the security
module maintained attributes of the current process.
Create a system call lsm_set_self_attr() to set a security
module maintained attribute of the current process.
Historically these attributes have been exposed to user space via
entries in procfs under /proc/self/attr.

The attribute value is provided in a lsm_ctx structure. The structure
identifies the size of the attribute, and the attribute value. The format
of the attribute value is defined by the security module. A flags field
is included for LSM specific information. It is currently unused and must
be 0. The total size of the data, including the lsm_ctx structure and any
padding, is maintained as well.

struct lsm_ctx {
        __u64 id;
        __u64 flags;
        __u64 len;
        __u64 ctx_len;
        __u8 ctx[];
};

Two new LSM hooks are used to interface with the LSMs.
security_getselfattr() collects the lsm_ctx values from the
LSMs that support the hook, accounting for space requirements.
security_setselfattr() identifies which LSM the attribute is
intended for and passes it along.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
---

quoted

quoted

+int security_getselfattr(unsigned int attr, struct lsm_ctx __user *uctx,
+			 size_t __user *size, u32 flags)
+{
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+	struct lsm_ctx lctx = { .id = LSM_ID_UNDEF, };
+	u8 __user *base = (u8 __user *)uctx;
+	size_t total = 0;
+	size_t entrysize;
+	size_t left;
+	bool toobig = false;
+	bool single = false;
+	int count = 0;
+	int rc;
+
+	if (attr == LSM_ATTR_UNDEF)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (size == NULL)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (get_user(left, size))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (flags) {
+		/*
+		 * Only flag supported is LSM_FLAG_SINGLE
+		 */
+		if (flags & LSM_FLAG_SINGLE)
+			return -EINVAL;

Should this be something like the following?

  if (flags & ~LSM_FLAG_SINGLE)
    return -EINVAL;

Yes. I have a fix ready. There are a couple other touch-ups, too.

This is already part of patch 11. It should be squashed here.