Re: [PATCH v2 11/14] futex: Implement FUTEX2_NUMA
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2023-08-08 16:49:28
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 11:11:04PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07 2023 at 14:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
/** * futex_hash - Return the hash bucket in the global hash * @key: Pointer to the futex key for which the hash is calculated@@ -114,10 +137,29 @@ late_initcall(fail_futex_debugfs); */ struct futex_hash_bucket *futex_hash(union futex_key *key) { - u32 hash = jhash2((u32 *)key, offsetof(typeof(*key), both.offset) / 4, + u32 hash = jhash2((u32 *)key, + offsetof(typeof(*key), both.offset) / sizeof(u32), key->both.offset); + int node = key->both.node; + + if (node == -1) {NUMA_NO_NODE please all over the place.
Ah, so our (futex2) ABI states this needs to be -1, but in theory someone could come along and change the kernel internal NUMA_NO_NODE to something else. That is, I explicitly chose not to use it. I can of course, because as of now these values do match.
quoted
+ /* + * In case of !FLAGS_NUMA, use some unused hash bits to pick a + * node -- this ensures regular futexes are interleaved across + * the nodes and avoids having to allocate multiple + * hash-tables. + * + * NOTE: this isn't perfectly uniform, but it is fast and + * handles sparse node masks. + */ + node = (hash >> futex_hashshift) % nr_node_ids; + if (!node_possible(node)) { + node = find_next_bit_wrap(node_possible_map.bits, + nr_node_ids, node); + }Smart.
Thanks :-)
quoted
+static inline unsigned int futex_size(unsigned int flags) +{ + return 1 << (flags & FLAGS_SIZE_MASK); +} + static inline bool futex_flags_valid(unsigned int flags)If you reorder these two functions in the patch which introduces them, this diff gets readable :)
Durr, I knew I was forgetting something, will do.