On Thu, 4 May 2023 19:26:11 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 +
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 +
This should be wired up on each and every architecture.
Currently we're getting
<stdin>:1567:2: warning: #warning syscall cachestat not implemented [-Wcpp]
in linux-next for all the missing architectures.
Is that wise? We risk adding a syscall to an architecture without the
arch maintainers and testers even knowing about it.
The compile-time nag is there to inform the arch maintainers that a new
syscall is available and that they should wire it up, run the selftest
and then ship the code if they're happy with the result.