On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 12:01 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:22:44PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
quoted
+void fpregs_lock_and_load(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * fpregs_lock() only disables preemption (mostly). So
modifying state
+ * in an interrupt could screw up some in progress fpregs
operation,
+ * but appear to work. Warn about it.
I don't like comments where it sounds like we don't know what we're
doing. "Appear to work"?
I can change it. This patch started with the observation that modifying
xstate from the kernel had been gotten wrong a couple times in the
past, so that is what this is referencing. Since then, the fancy
automatic solution got boiled down to this helper and a couple
warnings.