Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
[PATCH v1 0/8] LSM: Two basic syscalls · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-25
[PATCH v1 1/8] LSM: Identify modules by more than name · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-25
Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] LSM: Identify modules by more than name · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2022-10-26
[PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-25
Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2022-10-26
Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-26
Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> · 2022-10-27
Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2022-10-27
Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-28
Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-09
Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-11-10
Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-10
Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-09
Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-11-10
[PATCH v1 3/8] LSM: Identify the process attributes for each module · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-25
Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] LSM: Identify the process attributes for each module · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2022-10-26
Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] LSM: Identify the process attributes for each module · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-09
Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] LSM: Identify the process attributes for each module · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-11-10
Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] LSM: Identify the process attributes for each module · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-10
[PATCH v1 4/8] LSM: Maintain a table of LSM attribute data · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-25
Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] LSM: Maintain a table of LSM attribute data · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2022-10-26
Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] LSM: Maintain a table of LSM attribute data · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-27
Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] LSM: Maintain a table of LSM attribute data · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2022-10-27
Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] LSM: Maintain a table of LSM attribute data · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-27
Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] LSM: Maintain a table of LSM attribute data · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2022-10-27
Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] LSM: Maintain a table of LSM attribute data · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-09
[PATCH v1 5/8] proc: Use lsmids instead of lsm names for attrs · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-25
[PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-25
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2022-10-25
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · Greg KH <hidden> · 2022-10-26
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2022-10-26
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2022-10-26
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2022-10-26
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-09
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-11-10
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-10
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-10
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-11-11
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-11
[PATCH v1 8/8] lsm: wireup syscalls lsm_self_attr and lsm_module_list · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-25
Re: [PATCH v1 8/8] lsm: wireup syscalls lsm_self_attr and lsm_module_list · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2022-10-26
[PATCH v1 7/8] LSM: Create lsm_module_list system call · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-10-25
Re: [PATCH v1 7/8] LSM: Create lsm_module_list system call · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2022-10-26
Re: [PATCH v1 7/8] LSM: Create lsm_module_list system call · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2022-10-26
Re: [PATCH v1 7/8] LSM: Create lsm_module_list system call · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-09
Re: [PATCH v1 7/8] LSM: Create lsm_module_list system call · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2022-11-10
Re: [PATCH v1 7/8] LSM: Create lsm_module_list system call · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2022-11-10

From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2022-10-27 06:30:31
Also in: linux-security-module, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

2022-11-23 · [PATCH v1 2/8] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:36:34PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:

quoted

+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2022 Casey Schaufler [off-list ref]
+ * Copyright (C) Intel Corporation

No date for Intel?

The latest guidance I have received is that Intel does not want a date.

Ok, then I need to have an Intel lawyer sign off on a patch that does
this in order to have that be their official statement.  Otherwise, it
needs a date.

quoted

+ */
+
+#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_LSM_H
+#define _UAPI_LINUX_LSM_H
+
+/*
+ * ID values to identify security modules.
+ * A system may use more than one security module.
+ *
+ * LSM_ID_XXX values 0 - 31 are reserved for future use

Reserved for what?  Why?

You're not the first person to ask.

And the answer is?

I'll remove the reserved values for the next version.

Because we asked it will be removed?

confused,

greg k-h

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help