Re: [RFC PATCH] getvalues(2) prototype
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2022-03-23 12:13:42
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-man, linux-security-module, lkml
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
On 3/23/22 12:42, Greg KH wrote:quoted
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:quoted
On 3/23/22 08:16, Greg KH wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 08:27:12PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:quoted
Add a new userspace API that allows getting multiple short values in a single syscall. This would be useful for the following reasons: - Calling open/read/close for many small files is inefficient. E.g. on my desktop invoking lsof(1) results in ~60k open + read + close calls under /proc and 90% of those are 128 bytes or less.As I found out in testing readfile(): https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200704140250.423345-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (local) microbenchmarks do show a tiny improvement in doing something like this, but that's not a real-world application. Do you have anything real that can use this that shows a speedup?Add in network file systems. Demonstrating that this is useful locally and with micro benchmarks - yeah, helps a bit to make it locally faster. But the real case is when thousands of clients are handled by a few network servers. Even reducing wire latency for a single client would make a difference here.I think I tried running readfile on NFS. Didn't see any improvements. But please, try it again. Also note that this proposal isn't for NFS, or any other "real" filesystem :)How did you run it on NFS? To get real benefit you would need to add a READ_FILE rpc to the NFS protocol and code? Just having it locally won't avoid the expensive wire calls?
I did not touch anything related to NFS code, which is perhaps why I did not notice any difference :) thanks, greg k-h