RE: [PATCH 20/35] mm: Update can_follow_write_pte() for shadow stack
From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2022-02-10 22:45:10
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2022-02-10 22:45:10
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
From: Dave Hansen
Sent: 09 February 2022 22:52 On 1/30/22 13:18, Rick Edgecombe wrote:quoted
Like a writable data page, a shadow stack page is writable, and becomes read-only during copy-on-write, but it is always dirty.One other thing... The language in these changelogs is a bit sloppy. For instance, what does "always dirty" mean here? pte_dirty()? Or strictly _PAGE_DIRTY? In other words, logically dirty, or literally "has *the* dirty bit set"?
Doesn't COW have to set it readonly - so that the access faults. And then set the fault code set it readonly+dirty (without write) to allow the shadow stack accesses to not-fault. Or am I mis-guessing what the docs actually say? David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)