Thread (47 messages) 47 messages, 9 authors, 2022-01-28

Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2022-01-24 10:03:34
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 04:57:29PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
@@ -221,8 +227,11 @@ static inline void local_irq_disable_exi
  */
 static inline void irqentry_irq_enable(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
+	if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs)) {
 		local_irq_enable();
+		if (user_mode(regs) && (current->flags & PF_UMCG_WORKER))
+			umcg_sys_enter(regs, -1);
+	}
 }
Perhaps it would make sense to have separate umcg_sys_enter(regs) and
umcg_sys_enter_syscall(regs, syscallno)? Even if the former is just a wrapper,
to make the entry/exit bits clearly correspond for all the !syscall cases?
Can do I suppose.
Also, is the syscall case meant to nest within this, or syscall entry paths not
supposed to call irqentry_irq_enable() ?
No nesting, syscall_ vs irqentry_. And you can't have a syscall and an
exception both be from user at the same time :-)
quoted
 /**
@@ -232,8 +241,11 @@ static inline void irqentry_irq_enable(s
  */
 static inline void irqentry_irq_disable(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
+	if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs)) {
+		if (user_mode(regs) && (current->flags & PF_UMCG_WORKER))
+			umcg_sys_exit(regs);
 		local_irq_disable();
+	}
 }
Do the umcg_sys_{enter,exit}() calls need to happen with IRQs unmasked?
Yes; both can end up blocking.
* If not (and this nests): for arm64 these can live in our
  enter_from_user_mode() and exit_to_user_mode() helpers.

* If so (or this doesn't nest): for arm64 we'd need to rework our
  local_daif_{inherit,restore,mask}() calls to handle this, though I've been
  meaning to do that anyway to handle pseudo-NMI better.

Either way, it looks like we'd need helpers along the lines of:

| static __always_inline void umcg_enter_from_user(struct pt_regs *regs)
| {
| 	if (current->flags & PF_UMCG_WORKER)
| 		umcg_sys_enter(regs, -1);
| }
| 
| static __always_inline void umcg_exit_to_user(struct pt_regs *regs)
| {
| 	if (current->flags & PF_UMCG_WORKER)
| 		umcg_sys_exit(regs);
| }
Would something like:

#ifndef arch_irqentry_irq_enter
static __always_inline bool arch_irqentry_irq_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
	if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs)) {
		local_irq_enable();
		return true;
	}
	return false;
}
#endif

static __always_inline void irqentry_irq_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
	if (arch_irqentry_irq_inherit(regs)) {
		if (user_mode(regs) && (current->flags & PF_UMCG_WORKER))
			umcg_sys_enter(regs, -1);
	}
}

Work? Then arm64 can do:

static __always_inline bool arch_irqentry_irq_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
	local_daif_inherit();
	return interrupts_enabled(regs);
}

or somesuch...
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help