Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] x86: Implement arch_prctl(ARCH_VSYSCALL_CONTROL) to disable vsyscall

* Andy Lutomirski:

Is there a reason you didn't just change the check earlier in the
function to:

if (vsyscall_mode == NONE || current->mm->context.vsyscall_disabled)

Andrei requested that I don't print anything if vsyscall was disabled.

The original patch used a different message for better diagnostics.

Also, I still think the prctl should not be available if
vsyscall=emulate.  Either we should fully implement it or we should
not implement.  We could even do:

pr_warn_once("userspace vsyscall hardening request ignored because you
have vsyscall=emulate.  Unless you absolutely need vsyscall=emulate, 
update your system to use vsyscall=xonly.\n");

and thus encourage good behavior.

I think there is still some hardening applied even with
vsyscall=emulate.  The question is what is more important: the
additional hardening, or clean, easily described behavior of the
interface.

Maybe ARCH_VSYSCALL_CONTROL could return different values based on to
what degree it could disable vsyscall?

The pr_warn_once does not seem particularly useful.  Anyone who upgrades
glibc and still uses vsyscall=emulate will see that, with no way to
disable it.

Thanks,
Florian