Re: [PATCH v2 20/22] selftests: futex: Test sys_futex_waitv() timeout
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2021-11-09 13:05:41
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:52 PM André Almeida [off-list ref] wrote:
Às 08:18 de 09/11/21, Vasily Gorbik escreveu:quoted
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 02:11:09PM -0300, André Almeida wrote:quoted
Test if the futex_waitv timeout is working as expected, using the supported clockid options.quoted
+ /* futex_waitv with CLOCK_MONOTONIC */ + if (futex_get_abs_timeout(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &to, timeout_ns)) + return RET_FAIL; + res = futex_waitv(&waitv, 1, 0, &to, CLOCK_MONOTONIC); + test_timeout(res, &ret, "futex_waitv monotonic", ETIMEDOUT); + + /* futex_waitv with CLOCK_REALTIME */ + if (futex_get_abs_timeout(CLOCK_REALTIME, &to, timeout_ns)) + return RET_FAIL; + res = futex_waitv(&waitv, 1, 0, &to, CLOCK_REALTIME); + test_timeout(res, &ret, "futex_waitv realtime", ETIMEDOUT);Hi André, when built with -m32 and run as compat this two futex_waitv calls hang on x86 and s390 (noticed while wiring up futex_waitv). The rest of the futex selftests pass. This suggests some common compat issue? Any ideas?The issue is that futex_waitv() only accepts struct timespec that uses 64bit members. When using -m32, glibc will give you a 32bit timespec, thus the timeout won't wort. Someday glibc will provide 64bit timespec to 32bit userspace, given that this is affected by y2038 bug.
I think in the latest glibc you should be able to pass -D_TIME_BITS=64 to
the compiler to get the correct definition. Unfortunately, this only works
for simple test cases, but breaks if you call any interfaces from another
(non-glibc) library that depend on a particular time_t definition.
Alistair Francis also recently posted a set of helpers for the old futex()
call to make that easier to use from applications regardless of the libc
interface. I think it would be good to have this for futex_waitv() as well.
Arnd