Re: [PATCH v11 03/14] btrfs: don't advance offset for compressed bios in btrfs_csum_one_bio()
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Date: 2021-10-18 18:09:38
Also in:
linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:05:54PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 1.09.21 г. 20:00, Omar Sandoval wrote:quoted
From: Omar Sandoval <redacted> btrfs_csum_one_bio() loops over each filesystem block in the bio while keeping a cursor of its current logical position in the file in order to look up the ordered extent to add the checksums to. However, this doesn't make much sense for compressed extents, as a sector on disk does not correspond to a sector of decompressed file data. It happens to work because 1) the compressed bio always covers one ordered extent and 2) the size of the bio is always less than the size of the ordered extent. However, the second point will not always be true for encoded writes. Let's add a boolean parameter to btrfs_csum_one_bio() to indicate that it can assume that the bio only covers one ordered extent. Since we're already changing the signature, let's get rid of the contig parameter and make it implied by the offset parameter, similar to the change we recently made to btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(). Additionally, let's rename nr_sectors to blockcount to make it clear that it's the number of filesystem blocks, not the number of 512-byte sectors. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <redacted>Code-wise this looks, though I don't know why we are guaranteed that a compressed extent will only cover a single OE.
See submit_compressed_extents(): we always add an ordered extent that covers the whole range that we're submitting, and then btrfs_submit_compressed_write() creates one or more bios that are subsets of that range.
But I trust you so: Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <redacted>
Thanks!