Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 0/3] Provide fast access to thread specific data
From: Peter Oskolkov <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-10 16:28:17
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:13 AM Prakash Sangappa [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sep 10, 2021, at 8:18 AM, Peter Oskolkov [off-list ref] wrote: On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 5:16 PM Prakash Sangappa [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Including liunx-kernel.. Resending RFC. This patchset is not final. I am looking for feedback on this proposal to share thread specific data for us in latency sensitive codepath.Hi Prakash,quoted
I'd like to add here that Jann and I have been discussing a similar feature for my UMCG patchset: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAG48ez0mgCXpXnqAUsa0TcFBPjrid-74Gj=xG8HZqj2n+OPoKw@mail.gmail.com/ (local)Hi Peter, I will take a look.quoted
In short, due to the need to read/write to the userspace from non-sleepable contexts in the kernel it seems that we need to have some form of per task/thread kernel/userspace shared memory that is pinned, similar to what your sys_task_getshared does.Exactly. For this reason wanted kernel to allocate the pinned memory. Didn’t want to deal with files etc as a large number threads will be using the shared structure mechanism.quoted
Do you think your sys_task_getshared can be tweaked to return an arbitrarily-sized block of memory (subject to overall constraints) rather than a fixed number of "options"?I suppose it could. How big of a size? We don’t want to hold on to arbitrarily large amount of pinned memory. The preference would be for the kernel to decide what is going to be shared based on what functionality/data sharing is supported. In that sense the size is pre defined not something the userspace/application can ask.
There could be a sysctl or some other mechanism that limits the amount of memory pinned per mm (or per task). Having "options" hardcoded for such a generally useful feature seems limiting...
I have not looked at your use case.quoted
On a more general note, we have a kernel extension internally at Google, named "kuchannel", that is similar to what you propose here: per task/thread shared memory with counters and other stat fields that the kernel populates and the userspace reads (and some additional functionality that is not too relevant to the discussion).We have few other use cases for this we are looking at, which I can describe later. -Prakashquoted
Thanks, Peter [...]