Re: [PATCH v6 09/21] fsnotify: Allow events reported with an empty inode
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-25 21:50:55
Also in:
linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2021-08-25 · Re: [PATCH v6 09/21] fsnotify: Allow events reported with an empty inode · Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
- 2021-08-25 · Re: [PATCH v6 09/21] fsnotify: Allow events reported with an empty inode · Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <hidden>
- 2021-08-13 · Re: [PATCH v6 09/21] fsnotify: Allow events reported with an empty inode · Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
- 2021-08-12 · [PATCH v6 09/21] fsnotify: Allow events reported with an empty inode · Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <hidden>
Amir Goldstein [off-list ref] writes:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 9:40 PM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Amir Goldstein [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 12:41 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Some file system events (i.e. FS_ERROR) might not be associated with an inode. For these, it makes sense to associate them directly with the super block of the file system they apply to. This patch allows the event to be reported with a NULL inode, by recovering the superblock directly from the data field, if needed. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <redacted> -- Changes since v5: - add fsnotify_data_sb handle to retrieve sb from the data field. (jan) --- fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c index 30d422b8c0fc..536db02cb26e 100644 --- a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c +++ b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c@@ -98,6 +98,14 @@ void fsnotify_sb_delete(struct super_block *sb) fsnotify_clear_marks_by_sb(sb); } +static struct super_block *fsnotify_data_sb(const void *data, int data_type) +{ + struct inode *inode = fsnotify_data_inode(data, data_type); + struct super_block *sb = inode ? inode->i_sb : NULL; + + return sb; +} + /* * Given an inode, first check if we care what happens to our children. Inotify * and dnotify both tell their parents about events. If we care about any event@@ -455,8 +463,10 @@ static void fsnotify_iter_next(struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info) * @file_name is relative to * @file_name: optional file name associated with event * @inode: optional inode associated with event - - * either @dir or @inode must be non-NULL. - * if both are non-NULL event may be reported to both. + * If @dir and @inode are NULL, @data must have a type that + * allows retrieving the file system associated with thisIrrelevant comment. sb must always be available from @data.quoted
+ * event. if both are non-NULL event may be reported to + * both. * @cookie: inotify rename cookie */ int fsnotify(__u32 mask, const void *data, int data_type, struct inode *dir,@@ -483,7 +493,7 @@ int fsnotify(__u32 mask, const void *data, int data_type, struct inode *dir, */ parent = dir; } - sb = inode->i_sb; + sb = inode ? inode->i_sb : fsnotify_data_sb(data, data_type);const struct path *path = fsnotify_data_path(data, data_type); + const struct super_block *sb = fsnotify_data_sb(data, data_type); All the games with @data @inode and @dir args are irrelevant to this. sb should always be available from @data and it does not matter if fsnotify_data_inode() is the same as @inode, @dir or neither. All those inodes are anyway on the same sb.Hi Amir, I think this is actually necessary. I could identify at least one event (FS_CREATE | FS_ISDIR) where fsnotify is invoked with a NULL data field. In that case, fsnotify_dirent is called with a negative dentry from vfs_mkdir(). I'm not sure why exactly the dentry is negative after theThat doesn't sound right at all. Are you sure about this? Which filesystem was this mkdir called on?
You should be able to reproduce it on top of mainline if you pick only this
patch and do the change you suggested:
- sb = inode->i_sb;
+ sb = fsnotify_data_sb(data, data_type);
And then boot a Debian stable with systemd. The notification happens on
the cgroup pseudo-filesystem (/sys/fs/cgroup), which is being monitored
by systemd itself. The event that arrives with a NULL data is telling the
directory /sys/fs/cgroup/*/ about the creation of directory
`init.scope`.
The change above triggers the following null dereference of struct
super_block, since data is NULL.
I will keep looking but you might be able to answer it immediately...
fsnotify was called with:
data_type=2
mask=40000100
data=0
name=init.scope
The code looks like this:
fsnotify_mkdir(dir, dentry) {
fsnotify_dirent(inode, dentry, FS_CREATE | FS_ISDIR) {
fsnotify_name(dir, mask, d_inode(dentry), &dentry->d_name, 0) {
fsnotify(mask, child, FSNOTIFY_EVENT_INODE, dir, name, NULL, cookie);
}
}
}
The entire log:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000003a8
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.14.0-rc5- #279
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:fsnotify+0x103/0x5e0
Code: 84 c2 04 00 00 83 f8 02 0f 85 c6 04 00 00 48 8b 04 24 31 db 48 85 c0 0f 84 b9 04 00 00 48 8b 48 28 48 85 c9 0f 84 ac 04 00 00 <48> 83 b9 a8 03 00 00 00 0f 84 e3 03 00 00 8b 81 a0 03 00 00 48 85
RSP: 0018:ffffaff800013e18 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000026 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffaff800013ca8 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c0000000ffffefff
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffaff800013c48 R12: ffff9bbb80467778
R13: 0000000040000100 R14: 00000000000001ed R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007f2e4d2c4900(0000) GS:ffff9bbbbbd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000000003a8 CR3: 0000000100054000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
? cgroup_kn_unlock+0x33/0x80
? cgroup_mkdir+0x13e/0x410
vfs_mkdir+0x16e/0x1d0
do_mkdirat+0x8c/0x100
do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f2e4da91b07
Code: 1f 40 00 48 8b 05 89 f3 0c 00 64 c7 00 5f 00 00 00 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 59 f3 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffc02877ad8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000053
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc02877b50 RCX: 00007f2e4da91b07
RDX: 00007ffc02877980 RSI: 00000000000001ed RDI: 00005646df5f01d0
RBP: 00005646de9ed770 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00005646df5f01c0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc02877b50 R15: 00007ffc02877c60
Modules linked in:
CR2: 00000000000003a8
---[ end trace 4642e1d1df9669cb ]---
quoted
mkdir, but it would be possible we are racing with the file removal, INo. Both vfs_mkdir() and vfs_rmdir() hold the dir inode lock (on parent).quoted
guess? It might be a bug in fsnotify that this case even happen, but I'm not sure yet.fsnotify_data_inode() should not be NULL. fsnotify_handle_inode_event() passes fsnotify_data_inode() to callbacks like audit_watch_handle_event() that checks WARN_ON_ONCE(!inode)quoted
The easiest way around it is what I proposed: just use inode->i_sb if data is NULL. Since, as you said, data, inode and dir are all on the same superblock, it should work, I think.It would be papering over another issue. I don't mind if we use inode->i_sb as long as we understand the reason for what you are reporting. Please provide more information.
-- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi