Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add pidfd support to the fanotify API
From: Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>
Date: 2021-08-16 05:03:36
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
Hey Jan, On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:22:41AM +1000, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 01:33:48PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:quoted
Hello Matthew! On Sun 08-08-21 15:23:59, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:quoted
This is V5 of the FAN_REPORT_PIDFD patch series. It contains the minor comment/commit description fixes that were picked up by Amir in the last series review [0, 1]. LTP tests for this API change can be found here [2]. Man page updates for this change can be found here [3]. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAOQ4uxhnCk+FXK_e_GA=jC_0HWO+3ZdwHSi=zCa2Kpb0NDxBSg@mail.gmail.com/ (local) [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAOQ4uxgO3oViTSFZ0zs6brrHrmw362r1C9SQ7g6=XgRwyrzMuw@mail.gmail.com/ (local) [2] https://github.com/matthewbobrowski/ltp/tree/fanotify_pidfd_v2 [3] https://github.com/matthewbobrowski/man-pages/tree/fanotify_pidfd_v1 Matthew Bobrowski (5): kernel/pid.c: remove static qualifier from pidfd_create() kernel/pid.c: implement additional checks upon pidfd_create() parameters fanotify: minor cosmetic adjustments to fid labels fanotify: introduce a generic info record copying helper fanotify: add pidfd support to the fanotify APIThanks! I've pulled the series into my tree. Note that your fanotify21 LTP testcase is broken with the current kernel because 'ino' entry got added to fdinfo. I think having to understand all possible keys that can occur in fdinfo is too fragile. I understand why you want to do that but I guess the test would be too faulty to be practical. So I'd just ignore unknown keys in fdinfo for that test.Excellent, for merging these changes! In regards to the LTP test (fanotify21), at the time of writing I had also shared a similar thought in the sense that it was too fragile, but wrongly so I weighed up my decision based on the likelihood and frequency of fields being changed/added to fdinfo. I was very wrong... Anyway, I will fix it so that any "unknown" fields are ignored.
FWIW, I've dropped that last else statement in the parse_pidfd_fdinfo_line() helper in LTP fanotify21. An updated branch has been pushed here [0]. [0] https://github.com/matthewbobrowski/ltp/commits/fanotify_pidfd_v3 /M