On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:36 AM Hugh Dickins [off-list ref] wrote:
5.14 commit e6be37b2e7bd ("mm/huge_memory.c: add missing read-only THP
checking in transparent_hugepage_enabled()") added transhuge_vma_enabled()
as a wrapper for two very different checks: shmem_huge_enabled() prefers
to show those two checks explicitly, as before.
Basically I have no objection to separating them again. But IMHO they
seem not very different. Or just makes things easier for the following
patches?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
---
mm/shmem.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index ce3ccaac54d6..c6fa6f4f2db8 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -4003,7 +4003,8 @@ bool shmem_huge_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
loff_t i_size;
pgoff_t off;
- if (!transhuge_vma_enabled(vma, vma->vm_flags))
+ if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE) ||
+ test_bit(MMF_DISABLE_THP, &vma->vm_mm->flags))
return false;
if (shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_FORCE)
return true;
--2.26.2