Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 4 authors, 2021-01-29

Re: [PATCH] af_unix: Allow Unix sockets to raise SIGURG

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-29 20:19:37
Also in: lkml, netdev

On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 12:10:21 -0800 Shoaib Rao wrote:
On 1/29/21 12:02 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:48:15 -0800 Shoaib Rao wrote:  
quoted
Data was discarded because the flag was not supported, this patch
changes that but does not support any urgent data.  
When you say it does not support any urgent data do you mean the
message len must be == 0 because something is checking it, or that
the code does not support its handling?

I'm perfectly fine with the former, just point me at the check, please.  
The code does not care about the size of data -- All it does is that if 
MSG_OOB is set it will deliver the signal to the peer process 
irrespective of the length of the data (which can be zero length). Let's 
look at the code of unix_stream_sendmsg() It does the following (sent is 
initialized to zero)
Okay. Let me try again. AFAICS your code makes it so that data sent
with MSG_OOB is treated like any other data. It just sends a signal.
So you're hijacking the MSG_OOB to send a signal, because OOB also
sends a signal. But there is nothing OOB about the data itself. So 
I'm asking you to make sure that there is no data in the message. 
That way when someone wants _actual_ OOB data on UNIX sockets they 
can implement it without breaking backwards compatibility of the 
kernel uAPI.
while (sent < len) {
                 size = len - sent;
<..>

}

         if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB)
                 sk_send_sigurg(other);

Before the patch there was a check above the while loop that checked the 
flag and returned and error, that has been removed.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help