Re: [PATCH v11 6/9] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-09-03 16:15:44
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-09-03 16:15:44
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:12 AM Dave Hansen [off-list ref] wrote:
On 9/3/20 9:09 AM, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:quoted
If the debugger is going to write an MSR, only in the third case would this make a slight sense. For example, if the system has CET enabled, but the task does not have CET enabled, and GDB is writing to a CET MSR. But still, this is strange to me.If this is strange, then why do we even _implement_ writes?
Well, if gdb wants to force a tracee to return early from a function, wouldn't it want the ability to modify SSP? --Andy