Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 0/1] add sysfs exports for TPM 2 PCR registers
From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-08 05:46:02
Also in:
linux-integrity
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 02:52:08PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2020-09-07 at 16:23 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:quoted
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:38:24AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:quoted
Please just use a binary blob format. Binary sysfs files are exactly what this is for, you are just passing the data through the kernel from the hardware to userspace. You can have 24 binary files if that makes it easier, but the existing format really is an abuse of sysfs.There is no existing format for TPM 2.0 ... that's part of the problem since we certainly didn't want to carry over the TPM 1.2 format.
Ok, then no, if there is not already a binary format then you should not use a binary sysfs file as you are then just sending a kernel structure to userspace, not a hardware structure.
I've got to say I think binary attributes are actively evil. I can see they're a necessity when there's no good way to represent the data they contain, like the bios measurement log or firmware code or a raw interface like we do for the SMP frame code in libsas. But when there's a well understood and easy to produce user friendly non-binary representation, I think dumping binary is inimical to being a good API.
Agreed. thanks, greg k-h