Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] selftest/x86: Add CET quick test
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-05-22 09:36:46
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-05-22 09:36:46
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:17:20PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
+#pragma GCC push_options
+#pragma GCC optimize ("O0")
+void ibt_violation(void)
+{
+#ifdef __i386__
+ asm volatile("lea 1f, %eax");
+ asm volatile("jmp *%eax");
+#else
+ asm volatile("lea 1f, %rax");
+ asm volatile("jmp *%rax");
+#endif
+ asm volatile("1:");
+ result[test_id] = -1;
+ test_id++;
+ setcontext(&ucp);
+}
+
+void shstk_violation(void)
+{
+#ifdef __i386__
+ unsigned long x = 0;
+
+ ((unsigned long *)&x)[2] = (unsigned long)stack_hacked;
+#else
+ unsigned long long x = 0;
+
+ ((unsigned long long *)&x)[2] = (unsigned long)stack_hacked;
+#endif
+}
+#pragma GCC pop_options
This is absolutely atrocious.
The #pragma like Kees already said just need to go. Also, there's
absolutely no clue what so ever what it attempts to achieve.
The __i386__ ifdeffery is horrible crap. Splitting an asm with #ifdef
like that is also horrible crap.
This is not how you write code.
Get asm/asm.h into userspace and then write something like:
void ibt_violation(void)
{
asm volatile("lea 1f, %" _ASM_AX "\n\t"
"jmp *%" _ASM_AX "\n\t"
"1:\n\t" ::: "a");
WRITE_ONCE(result[test_id], -1);
WRITE_ONCE(test_id, test_id+1);
setcontext(&ucp);
}
void shstk_violation(void)
{
unsigned long x = 0;
WRITE_ONCE(x[2], stack_hacked);
}