Re: [PATCH] mm: use only pidfd for process_madvise syscall
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2020-05-18 23:06:59
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, 18 May 2020 14:13:50 -0700 Minchan Kim [off-list ref] wrote:
Andrew, I sent this patch without folding into previous syscall introducing patches because it could be arguable. If you want to fold it into each patchset(i.e., introdcuing process_madvise syscall and introducing compat_syscall), let me know it. I will send partial diff to each patchset.
It doesn't seem necessary - I believe we'll get a clean result if I squish all of these: mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix.patch mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix.patch mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix-fix.patch mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix-fix-fix.patch mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix.patch mm-use-only-pidfd-for-process_madvise-syscall.patch into mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise.patch and make the appropriate changelog adjustments?