Re: [PATCH RFC 00/18] xfs: atomic file updates
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Date: 2020-05-01 19:46:39
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 4:46 AM Darrick J. Wong [off-list ref] wrote:
This series creates a new log incompat feature and log intent items to track high level progress of swapping ranges of two files and finish interrupted work if the system goes down. It then adds a new FISWAPRANGE ioctl so that userspace can access the atomic extent swapping feature. With this feature, user programs will be able to update files atomically by opening an O_TMPFILE, reflinking the source file to it, making whatever updates they want to make, and then atomically swap the changed bits back to the source file. It even has an optional ability to detect a changed source file and reject the update. The intent behind this new userspace functionality is to enable atomic rewrites of arbitrary parts of individual files. For years, application programmers wanting to ensure the atomicity of a file update had to write the changes to a new file in the same directory, fsync the new file, rename the new file on top of the old filename, and then fsync the directory. People get it wrong all the time, and $fs hacks abound. With atomic file updates, this is no longer necessary. Programmers create an O_TMPFILE, optionally FICLONE the file contents into the temporary file, make whatever changes they want to the tempfile, and FISWAPRANGE the contents from the tempfile into the regular file.
That also requires the *readers* to be atomic though, right? Since now the updates are visible to readers instantly, instead of only on the next open()? If you used this to update /etc/passwd while someone else is in the middle of reading it with a sequence of read() calls, there would be fireworks... I guess maybe the new API could also be wired up to ext4's EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT somehow, provided that the caller specifies FILE_SWAP_RANGE_NONATOMIC?