Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2020-04-11

Re: What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?

From: Florian Weimer <hidden>
Date: 2020-04-11 10:51:47
Also in: linux-fsdevel

* Aleksa Sarai:
It would just give you -EXDEV (or perhaps -EREMOTE) if you walk into an
automount (the same logic as with the other RESOLVE_NO_* flags). We
could make it -ENOENT if you prefer, but that means userspace can't tell
the difference between it hitting an automount and the target actually
not existing.
Maybe there's a better way to show the difference to userspace
involving something related to O_PATH?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help