Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 3 authors, 2020-04-02

Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] proc: move hidepid values to uapi as they are user interface to mount

From: Alexey Gladkov <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-28 23:00:56
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 02:53:49PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+/* definitions for hide_pid field */
+enum {
+	HIDEPID_OFF            = 0,
+	HIDEPID_NO_ACCESS      = 1,
+	HIDEPID_INVISIBLE      = 2,
+	HIDEPID_NOT_PTRACEABLE = 4,
+};
Should the numeric values still be UAPI if there is string parsing now?
I think yes, because these are still valid hidepid= values.
But if we don't expose the values, we can do whatever we like with
future numbers (e.g. the "is this a value or a bit field?" question).
Alexey Dobriyan suggested to put these parameters into the UAPI and it
makes sense because these are user parameters.

-- 
Rgrds, legion
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help