Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] proc: move hidepid values to uapi as they are user interface to mount
From: Alexey Gladkov <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-28 23:00:56
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml
From: Alexey Gladkov <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-28 23:00:56
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 02:53:49PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+/* definitions for hide_pid field */ +enum { + HIDEPID_OFF = 0, + HIDEPID_NO_ACCESS = 1, + HIDEPID_INVISIBLE = 2, + HIDEPID_NOT_PTRACEABLE = 4, +};Should the numeric values still be UAPI if there is string parsing now?I think yes, because these are still valid hidepid= values.But if we don't expose the values, we can do whatever we like with future numbers (e.g. the "is this a value or a bit field?" question).
Alexey Dobriyan suggested to put these parameters into the UAPI and it makes sense because these are user parameters. -- Rgrds, legion