Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
flat view
From: Aleksa Sarai <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-29 15:54:29
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On 2020-03-01, Aleksa Sarai [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2020-02-28, Christian Brauner [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
So we either end up adding new AT_* flags mirroring the new RESOLVE_* flags or we end up adding new RESOLVE_* flags mirroring parts of AT_* flags. And if that's a possibility I vote for RESOLVE_* flags going forward. The have better naming too imho.I can see the argument for merging AT_ flags into RESOLVE_ flags (fewer flag arguments for syscalls is usually a good thing) ... but I don't really like it. There are a couple of problems right off the bat: * The prefix RESOLVE_ implies that the flag is specifically about path resolution. While you could argue that AT_EMPTY_PATH is at least *related* to path resolution, flags like AT_REMOVEDIR and AT_RECURSIVE aren't. * That point touches on something I see as a more fundamental problem in the AT_ flags -- they were intended to be generic flags for all of the ...at(2) syscalls. But then AT_ grew things like AT_STATX_ and AT_REMOVEDIR (both of which are necessary features to have for their respective syscalls, but now those flag bits are dead for other syscalls -- not to mention the whole AT_SYMLINK_{NO,}FOLLOW thing). * While the above might be seen as minor quibbles, the really big issue is that even the flags which are "similar" (AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW and RESOLVE_NO_SYMLINKS) have different semantics (by design -- in my view, AT_SYMLINK_{NO,}FOLLOW / O_NOFOLLOW / lstat(2) has always had the wrong semantics if the intention was to be a way to safely avoid resolving symlinks). But maybe I'm just overthinking what a merge of AT_ and RESOLVE_ would look like -- would it on.
Eugh, dropped the rest of that sentence: ... would it only be the few AT_ flags which are strictly related to path resolution (such as AT_EMPTY_PATH)? If so wouldn't that just mean we end up with two flag arguments for new syscalls? -- Aleksa Sarai Senior Software Engineer (Containers) SUSE Linux GmbH <https://www.cyphar.com/>
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 228 bytes