Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] fs: add O_ALLOW_ENCODED open flag
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-02-29 10:44:51
Also in:
linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-02-29 10:44:51
Also in:
linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 1:14 AM Omar Sandoval [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Omar Sandoval <redacted> The upcoming RWF_ENCODED operation introduces some security concerns: 1. Compressed writes will pass arbitrary data to decompression algorithms in the kernel. 2. Compressed reads can leak truncated/hole punched data. Therefore, we need to require privilege for RWF_ENCODED. It's not possible to do the permissions checks at the time of the read or write because, e.g., io_uring submits IO from a worker thread. So, add an open flag which requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN. It can also be set and cleared with fcntl(). The flag is not cleared in any way on fork or exec; it should probably be used with O_CLOEXEC in most cases.
So let's be more proactive and disallow setting O_ALLOW_ENCODED without O_CLOEXEC, shall we?
Note that the usual issue that unknown open flags are ignored doesn't really matter for O_ALLOW_ENCODED; if the kernel doesn't support O_ALLOW_ENCODED, then it doesn't support RWF_ENCODED, either.
And for that matter, setting O_ALLOW_ENCODED without O_CLOEXEC won't do any harm with old kernels - even better, it can serve as a fast test for kernel RWF_ENCODED support using only the openat() syscall. Thanks, Amir.