Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 4 authors, 2020-02-17

Re: [PATCH v2 04/28] fsuidgid: add fsid mapping helpers

From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Date: 2020-02-14 19:13:09
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 7:37 PM Christian Brauner
[off-list ref] wrote:
This adds a set of helpers to translate between kfsuid/kfsgid and their
userspace fsuid/fsgid counter parts relative to a given user namespace.

- kuid_t make_kfsuid(struct user_namespace *from, uid_t fsuid)
  Maps a user-namespace fsuid pair into a kfsuid.
  If no fsuid mappings have been written it behaves identical to calling
  make_kuid(). This ensures backwards compatibility for workloads unaware
  or not in need of fsid mappings.
[...]
+#ifdef CONFIG_USER_NS_FSID
+/**
+ *     make_kfsuid - Map a user-namespace fsuid pair into a kuid.
+ *     @ns:  User namespace that the fsuid is in
+ *     @fsuid: User identifier
+ *
+ *     Maps a user-namespace fsuid pair into a kernel internal kfsuid,
+ *     and returns that kfsuid.
+ *
+ *     When there is no mapping defined for the user-namespace kfsuid
+ *     pair INVALID_UID is returned.  Callers are expected to test
+ *     for and handle INVALID_UID being returned.  INVALID_UID
+ *     may be tested for using uid_valid().
+ */
+kuid_t make_kfsuid(struct user_namespace *ns, uid_t fsuid)
+{
+       unsigned extents = ns->fsuid_map.nr_extents;
+       smp_rmb();
+
+       /* Map the fsuid to a global kernel fsuid */
+       if (extents == 0)
+               return KUIDT_INIT(map_id_down(&ns->uid_map, fsuid));
+
+       return KUIDT_INIT(map_id_down(&ns->fsuid_map, fsuid));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(make_kfsuid);
What effect is this fallback going to have for nested namespaces?

Let's say we have an outer namespace N1 with this uid_map:

    0 100000 65535

and with this fsuid_map:

    0 300000 65535

Now from in there, a process that is not aware of the existence of
fsuid mappings creates a new user namespace N2 with the following
uid_map:

    0 1000 1

At this point, if a process in N2 does chown("foo", 0, 0), is that
going to make "foo" owned by kuid 101000, which isn't even mapped in
N1?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1215,11 +1376,13 @@ static bool new_idmap_permitted(const struct file *file,
            uid_eq(ns->owner, cred->euid)) {
                u32 id = new_map->extent[0].lower_first;
                if (cap_setid == CAP_SETUID) {
-                       kuid_t uid = make_kuid(ns->parent, id);
+                       kuid_t uid = map_fsid ? make_kfsuid(ns->parent, id) :
+                                               make_kuid(ns->parent, id);
                        if (uid_eq(uid, cred->euid))
                                return true;
Let's say we have an outer user namespace N1 with this uid_map:

    0 1000 3000

and this fsuid_map:

    0 2000 3000

and in that namespace, a process is running as UID 1000 (which means
kernel-euid=2000, kernel-fsuid=3000). Now this process unshares its
user namespace and from this nested user namespace N2, tries to write
the following fsuid_map:

    0 1000 1

This should work, since the only ID it maps is the one the process had
in N1; but the code is AFAICS going to run as follows:

        if ((new_map->nr_extents == 1) && (new_map->extent[0].count == 1) &&
            uid_eq(ns->owner, cred->euid)) { // branch taken
                u32 id = new_map->extent[0].lower_first;
                if (cap_setid == CAP_SETUID) { // branch taken
                        // uid = make_kfsuid(ns->parent, 1000) = 3000
                        kuid_t uid = map_fsid ? make_kfsuid(ns->parent, id) :
                                                make_kuid(ns->parent, id);
                        // uid_eq(3000, 2000)
                        if (uid_eq(uid, cred->euid)) // not taken
                                return true;
                } else [...]
        }

Instead, I think what would succeed is this, which shouldn't be allowed:

    0 0 1

which AFAICS will evaluate as follows:

        if ((new_map->nr_extents == 1) && (new_map->extent[0].count == 1) &&
            uid_eq(ns->owner, cred->euid)) { // branch taken
                u32 id = new_map->extent[0].lower_first;
                if (cap_setid == CAP_SETUID) { // branch taken
                        // uid = make_kfsuid(ns->parent, 0) = 2000
                        kuid_t uid = map_fsid ? make_kfsuid(ns->parent, id) :
                                                make_kuid(ns->parent, id);
                        // uid_eq(2000, 2000)
                        if (uid_eq(uid, cred->euid)) // taken
                                return true;
                } else [...]
        }
                } else if (cap_setid == CAP_SETGID) {
-                       kgid_t gid = make_kgid(ns->parent, id);
+                       kgid_t gid = map_fsid ? make_kfsgid(ns->parent, id) :
+                                               make_kgid(ns->parent, id);
                        if (!(ns->flags & USERNS_SETGROUPS_ALLOWED) &&
                            gid_eq(gid, cred->egid))
                                return true;
--
2.25.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help