(replying again as plain text for mailing lists)
----- On Jan 22, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Jan Ziak 0xe2.0x9a.0x9b-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
Hello
I would like to note that this does not help userspace to express dynamic
scheduling relationships among processes/threads such as "do not run processes
A and B on the same core" or "run processes A and B on cores sharing the same
L2 cache".
Indeed, this is not what this system call is trying to solve. Does the name "pin_on_cpu" lead
to confusion here ?
I thought that cgroups was already the mechanism taking care of this kind of requirement.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com