Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2020-01-08

Re: [PATCH v6 07/10] proc: flush task dcache entries from all procfs instances

From: Alexey Gladkov <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-03 08:56:45
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 02:03:29PM -0800, J Freyensee wrote:
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+static inline void pidns_proc_lock(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
+{
+	down_write(&pid_ns->rw_proc_mounts);
+}
+
+static inline void pidns_proc_unlock(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
+{
+	up_write(&pid_ns->rw_proc_mounts);
+}
+
+static inline void pidns_proc_lock_shared(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
+{
+	down_read(&pid_ns->rw_proc_mounts);
+}
+
+static inline void pidns_proc_unlock_shared(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
+{
+	up_read(&pid_ns->rw_proc_mounts);
+}
+#else /* !CONFIG_PROC_FS */
+
Apologies for my newbie question. I couldn't help but notice all these
function calls are assuming that the parameter struct pid_namespace *pid_ns
will never be NULL.  Is that a good assumption?
These inline helpers are introduced to improve readability. They only make
sense inside procfs. I don't think that defensive programming is useful
here.

-- 
Rgrds, legion
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help