Re: [PATCH ghak90 V7 20/21] audit: add capcontid to set contid outside init_user_ns
From: Richard Guy Briggs <hidden>
Date: 2019-11-01 15:09:54
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml, netdev, netfilter-devel
On 2019-10-31 10:50, Steve Grubb wrote:
Hello, TLDR; I see a lot of benefit to switching away from procfs for setting auid & sessionid. On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:03:20 PM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote:quoted
quoted
Also, for the record, removing the audit loginuid from procfs is not something to take lightly, if at all; like it or not, it's part of the kernel API.It can also be used by tools to iterate processes related to one user or session. I use this in my Intrusion Prevention System which will land in audit user space at some point in the future.quoted
Oh, I'm quite aware of how important this change is and it was discussed with Steve Grubb who saw the concern and value of considering such a disruptive change.Actually, I advocated for syscall. I think the gist of Eric's idea was that / proc is the intersection of many nasty problems. By relying on it, you can't simplify the API to reduce the complexity. Almost no program actually needs access to /proc. ps does. But almost everything else is happy without it. For example, when you setup chroot jails, you may have to add /dev/random or / dev/null, but almost never /proc. What does force you to add /proc is any entry point daemon like sshd because it needs to set the loginuid. If we switch away from /proc, then sshd or crond will no longer /require/ procfs to be available which again simplifies the system design.quoted
Removing proc support for auid/ses would be a long-term deprecation if accepted.It might need to just be turned into readonly for a while. But then again, perhaps auid and session should be part of /proc/<pid>/status? Maybe this can be done independently and ahead of the container work so there is a migration path for things that read auid or session. TBH, maybe this should have been done from the beginning.
How about making loginuid/contid/capcontid writable only via netlink but still provide the /proc interface for reading? Deprecation of proc can be left as a decision for later. This way sshd/crond/getty don't need /proc, but the info is still there for tools that want to read it.
-Steve
- RGB