Re: For review: pidfd_open(2) manual page
flat view
From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <hidden>
Date: 2019-09-23 20:21:34
Also in:
linux-man, lkml
Hello Christian, On 9/23/19 4:38 PM, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:11:53AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:quoted
Hello Christian and all, Below, I have the rendered version of the current draft of the pidfd_open(2) manual page that I have written. The page source can be found in a Git branch at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git/log/?h=draft_pidfd I would be pleased to receive corrections and notes on any details that should be added. (For example, are there error cases that I have missed?) Would you be able to review please?Again, thank you Michael for doing this!quoted
Thanks, Michael NAME pidfd_open - obtain a file descriptor that refers to a process SYNOPSIS int pidfd_open(pid_t pid, unsigned int flags); DESCRIPTION The pidfd_open() system creates a file descriptor that refers tos/system/system call/
Fixed.
quoted
the process whose PID is specified in pid. The file descriptor is returned as the function result; the close-on-exec flag is set on the file descriptor. The flags argument is reserved for future use; currently, this argument must be specified as 0. RETURN VALUE On success, pidfd_open() returns a nonnegative file descriptor. On success, -1 is returned and errno is set to indicate the causes/On success/On error/g
Fixed.
quoted
of the error. ERRORS EINVAL flags is not 0. EINVAL pid is not valid. ESRCH The process specified by pid does not exist. VERSIONS pidfd_open() first appeared in Linux 5.3. CONFORMING TO pidfd_open() is Linux specific. NOTES Currently, there is no glibc wrapper for this system call; call it using syscall(2). The pidfd_send_signal(2) system call can be used to send a signal to the process referred to by a PID file descriptor. A PID file descriptor can be monitored using poll(2), select(2), and epoll(7). When the process that it refers to terminates, the file descriptor indicates as readable. Note, however, that in theNot a native English speaker but should this be "indicates it is readable"?
See my reply to Florian.
quoted
current implementation, nothing can be read from the file descrip‐ tor. The pidfd_open() system call is the preferred way of obtaining a PID file descriptor. The alternative is to obtain a file descrip‐ tor by opening a /proc/[pid] directory. However, the latter tech‐ nique is possible only if the proc(5) file system is mounted; fur‐ thermore, the file descriptor obtained in this way is not pol‐ lable.I mentioned this already in the CLONE_PIDFD manpage, we should probably not make a big deal out of this and not mention /proc/<pid> here at all.
The thing is, people *will* learn about these two different types of FDs, whether we document them or not. So, I think it's better to be up front about what's available, and make a suitably strong recommendation about the preferred technique. Reading between the lines, it sounds like just a couple of releases after it was implemented, you're saying that implementing open(/proc/PID) was a mistake?
(Crazy idea, but we could also have a config option that allows you to turn of proc-pid-dirfds as pidfds if we start to feel really strongly about this or a sysctl whatever...)quoted
See also the discussion of the CLONE_PIDFD flag in clone(2). EXAMPLE The program below opens a PID file descriptor for the process whose PID is specified as its command-line argument. It then mon‐ itors the file descriptor for readability (POLLIN) using poll(2).Yeah, maybe say "monitors the file descriptor for process exit indicated by an EPOLLIN event" or something. Readability might be confusing.
I like that suggestion! I reworded to something close to what you suggest.
quoted
When the process with the specified by PID terminates, poll(2) returns, and indicates that the file descriptor is readable.See comment above "readable". (I'm on my phone and I think someone pointed this out already.)
Actually, I think I can just remove that sentence. It doesn't really add much.
quoted
Program source #define _GNU_SOURCE #include <sys/syscall.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <poll.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #ifndef __NR_pidfd_open #define __NR_pidfd_open 434 #endifAlpha is special... (and not in a good way). So you would need to special case Alpha since that's the only arch where we haven't been able to unify syscall numbering. :D But it's not super important.
Okay.
I like the program example.
Good. Thanks for reviewing! I've pushed various changes to the Git branch at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git/log/?h=draft_pidfd Cheers, Michael
quoted
static int pidfd_open(pid_t pid, unsigned int flags) { return syscall(__NR_pidfd_open, pid, flags); } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct pollfd pollfd; int pidfd, ready; if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <pid>\n", argv[0]); exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } pidfd = pidfd_open(atoi(argv[1]), 0); if (pidfd == -1) { perror("pidfd_open"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } pollfd.fd = pidfd; pollfd.events = POLLIN; ready = poll(&pollfd, 1, -1); if (ready == -1) { perror("poll"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("Events (0x%x): POLLIN is %sset\n", pollfd.revents, (pollfd.revents & POLLIN) ? "" : "not "); exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } SEE ALSO clone(2), kill(2), pidfd_send_signal(2), poll(2), select(2), epoll(7) -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
-- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/