Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 10 authors, 2019-09-26

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: add RWF_ENCODED for writing compressed data

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2019-09-20 16:25:10
Also in: linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel

On 9/19/19 9:44 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:54 AM Omar Sandoval [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Btrfs can transparently compress data written by the user. However, we'd
like to add an interface to write pre-compressed data directly to the
filesystem. This adds support for so-called "encoded writes" via
pwritev2().

A new RWF_ENCODED flags indicates that a write is "encoded". If this
flag is set, iov[0].iov_base points to a struct encoded_iov which
contains metadata about the write: namely, the compression algorithm and
the unencoded (i.e., decompressed) length of the extent. iov[0].iov_len
must be set to sizeof(struct encoded_iov), which can be used to extend
the interface in the future. The remaining iovecs contain the encoded
extent.

A similar interface for reading encoded data can be added to preadv2()
in the future.

Filesystems must indicate that they support encoded writes by setting
FMODE_ENCODED_IO in ->file_open().
[...]
quoted
+int import_encoded_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct encoded_iov *encoded,
+                        struct iov_iter *from)
+{
+       if (iov_iter_single_seg_count(from) != sizeof(*encoded))
+               return -EINVAL;
+       if (copy_from_iter(encoded, sizeof(*encoded), from) != sizeof(*encoded))
+               return -EFAULT;
+       if (encoded->compression == ENCODED_IOV_COMPRESSION_NONE &&
+           encoded->encryption == ENCODED_IOV_ENCRYPTION_NONE) {
+               iocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_ENCODED;
+               return 0;
+       }
+       if (encoded->compression > ENCODED_IOV_COMPRESSION_TYPES ||
+           encoded->encryption > ENCODED_IOV_ENCRYPTION_TYPES)
+               return -EINVAL;
+       if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+               return -EPERM;
How does this capable() check interact with io_uring? Without having
looked at this in detail, I suspect that when an encoded write is
requested through io_uring, the capable() check might be executed on
something like a workqueue worker thread, which is probably running
with a full capability set.
If we can hit -EAGAIN before doing the import in io_uring, then yes,
this will probably bypass the check as it'll only happen from the
worker.

-- 
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help