Thread (63 messages) 63 messages, 12 authors, 2019-09-18

Re: [PATCH v12 01/12] lib: introduce copy_struct_{to,from}_user helpers

From: Christian Brauner <hidden>
Date: 2019-09-05 11:09:55
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-kselftest, linux-mips, linux-s390, linux-sh, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 06:19:22AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
A common pattern for syscall extensions is increasing the size of a
struct passed from userspace, such that the zero-value of the new fields
result in the old kernel behaviour (allowing for a mix of userspace and
kernel vintages to operate on one another in most cases). This is done
in both directions -- hence two helpers -- though it's more common to
have to copy user space structs into kernel space.

Previously there was no common lib/ function that implemented
the necessary extension-checking semantics (and different syscalls
implemented them slightly differently or incompletely[1]). A future
patch replaces all of the common uses of this pattern to use the new
copy_struct_{to,from}_user() helpers.

[1]: For instance {sched_setattr,perf_event_open,clone3}(2) all do do
     similar checks to copy_struct_from_user() while rt_sigprocmask(2)
     always rejects differently-sized struct arguments.

Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <redacted>
I would probably split this out into a separate patchset. It can very
well go in before openat2(). Thoughts?

Christian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help