Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/3] bpf: implement CAP_BPF
From: Song Liu <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-29 06:05:30
Also in:
bpf, netdev
On Aug 28, 2019, at 10:12 PM, Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 44e2d640b088..91a7f25512ca 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c@@ -805,10 +805,20 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,} } +struct libcap { + struct __user_cap_header_struct hdr; + struct __user_cap_data_struct data[2]; +}; +
I am confused by struct libcap. Why do we need it?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
static int set_admin(bool admin) { cap_t caps; - const cap_value_t cap_val = CAP_SYS_ADMIN; + /* need CAP_BPF to load progs and CAP_NET_ADMIN to run networking progs, + * and CAP_TRACING to create stackmap + */ + const cap_value_t cap_net_admin = CAP_NET_ADMIN; + const cap_value_t cap_sys_admin = CAP_SYS_ADMIN; + struct libcap *cap; int ret = -1; caps = cap_get_proc();@@ -816,11 +826,26 @@ static int set_admin(bool admin)perror("cap_get_proc"); return -1; } - if (cap_set_flag(caps, CAP_EFFECTIVE, 1, &cap_val, + cap = (struct libcap *)caps; + if (cap_set_flag(caps, CAP_EFFECTIVE, 1, &cap_sys_admin, CAP_CLEAR)) { + perror("cap_set_flag clear admin"); + goto out; + } + if (cap_set_flag(caps, CAP_EFFECTIVE, 1, &cap_net_admin, admin ? CAP_SET : CAP_CLEAR)) { - perror("cap_set_flag"); + perror("cap_set_flag set_or_clear net"); goto out; } + /* libcap is likely old and simply ignores CAP_BPF and CAP_TRACING, + * so update effective bits manually + */ + if (admin) { + cap->data[1].effective |= 1 << (38 /* CAP_BPF */ - 32); + cap->data[1].effective |= 1 << (39 /* CAP_TRACING */ - 32); + } else { + cap->data[1].effective &= ~(1 << (38 - 32)); + cap->data[1].effective &= ~(1 << (39 - 32)); + }
And why we do not need cap->data[0]? Thanks, Song