Re: [PATCHv6 01/36] ns: Introduce Time Namespace
From: Andrei Vagin <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-16 06:11:25
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 07:19:12PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dmitry, On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Dmitry Safonov wrote:quoted
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 420567d1519a..97b7737f5aba 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS@@ -12898,6 +12898,8 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git timers/core S: Maintained F: fs/timerfd.c F: include/linux/timer* +F: include/linux/time_namespace.h +F: kernel/time_namespace.cShouldn't this be kernel/time/namespace.c so all that stuff is lumped together. No strong opinion though.
Sure, we can move this in kernel/time. I don't remember why I decided to place it in kernel/.
quoted
+++ b/kernel/time_namespace.c +static struct ucounts *inc_time_namespaces(struct user_namespace *ns) +{ + return inc_ucount(ns, current_euid(), UCOUNT_TIME_NAMESPACES); +} + +static void dec_time_namespaces(struct ucounts *ucounts) +{ + dec_ucount(ucounts, UCOUNT_TIME_NAMESPACES); +} + +static struct time_namespace *create_time_ns(void) +{ + struct time_namespace *time_ns; + + time_ns = kmalloc(sizeof(struct time_namespace), GFP_KERNEL);Shouldn't this use kzalloc()? There are tons of members in that struct.
I don't think so. All of other members are initialized in clone_time_ns. Maybe we don't need this helper. When I wrote this code, I looked at kernel/utsname.c. I will think what we can do here to make this code more clear.
quoted
+ if (time_ns) { + kref_init(&time_ns->kref); + time_ns->initialized = false;And you spare this one.
This one should be initialized in clone_time_ns too.
quoted
+ } + return time_ns; +} + +/* + * Clone a new ns copying @old_ns, setting refcount to 1 + * @old_ns: namespace to clone + * Return the new ns or ERR_PTR.If you use kernel-doc style then please use te proper syntax /* * clone_time_ns - Clone a time namespace * @old_ns: Namespace to clone * * Clone @old_ns and set the clone refcount to 1 * * Return: The new namespace or ERR_PTR. */
Will fix. Thanks!
quoted
+ */ +static struct time_namespace *clone_time_ns(struct user_namespace *user_ns, + struct time_namespace *old_ns) +{ + struct time_namespace *ns; + struct ucounts *ucounts; + int err; + + err = -ENOSPC; + ucounts = inc_time_namespaces(user_ns); + if (!ucounts) + goto fail; + + err = -ENOMEM; + ns = create_time_ns(); + if (!ns) + goto fail_dec; + + err = ns_alloc_inum(&ns->ns); + if (err) + goto fail_free; + + ns->ucounts = ucounts; + ns->ns.ops = &timens_operations; + ns->user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns); + return ns; + +fail_free: + kfree(ns); +fail_dec: + dec_time_namespaces(ucounts); +fail: + return ERR_PTR(err); +} + +/* + * Add a reference to old_ns, or clone it if @flags specify CLONE_NEWTIME. + * In latter case, changes to the time of this process won't be seen by parent, + * and vice versa.Ditto
Will fix.
quoted
+ */ +struct time_namespace *copy_time_ns(unsigned long flags, + struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct time_namespace *old_ns) +{ + if (!(flags & CLONE_NEWTIME)) + return get_time_ns(old_ns); + + return clone_time_ns(user_ns, old_ns); +} + +void free_time_ns(struct kref *kref) +{ + struct time_namespace *ns; + + ns = container_of(kref, struct time_namespace, kref); + dec_time_namespaces(ns->ucounts); + put_user_ns(ns->user_ns); + ns_free_inum(&ns->ns); + kfree(ns); +} + +static struct time_namespace *to_time_ns(struct ns_common *ns) +{ + return container_of(ns, struct time_namespace, ns); +} + +static struct ns_common *timens_get(struct task_struct *task) +{ + struct time_namespace *ns = NULL; + struct nsproxy *nsproxy; + + task_lock(task); + nsproxy = task->nsproxy; + if (nsproxy) { + ns = nsproxy->time_ns; + get_time_ns(ns); + } + task_unlock(task); + + return ns ? &ns->ns : NULL; +} + +static struct ns_common *timens_for_children_get(struct task_struct *task) +{ + struct time_namespace *ns = NULL; + struct nsproxy *nsproxy; + + task_lock(task); + nsproxy = task->nsproxy; + if (nsproxy) { + ns = nsproxy->time_ns_for_children; + get_time_ns(ns); + } + task_unlock(task); + + return ns ? &ns->ns : NULL; +} + +static void timens_put(struct ns_common *ns) +{ + put_time_ns(to_time_ns(ns)); +} + +static int timens_install(struct nsproxy *nsproxy, struct ns_common *new) +{ + struct time_namespace *ns = to_time_ns(new); + + if (!current_is_single_threaded()) + return -EUSERS; + + if (!ns_capable(ns->user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || + !ns_capable(current_user_ns(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + return -EPERM; + + get_time_ns(ns); + get_time_ns(ns);Why is this a double get?
Because we change nsproxy->time_ns and nsproxy->time_ns_for_children. Probably, I need to reorgonize the code this way: get_time_ns(ns); put_time_ns(nsproxy->time_ns); nsproxy->time_ns = ns; get_time_ns(ns); put_time_ns(nsproxy->time_ns_for_children); nsproxy->time_ns_for_children = ns;
quoted
+ put_time_ns(nsproxy->time_ns); + put_time_ns(nsproxy->time_ns_for_children); + nsproxy->time_ns = ns; + nsproxy->time_ns_for_children = ns; + ns->initialized = true; + return 0; +} + +int timens_on_fork(struct nsproxy *nsproxy, struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + struct ns_common *nsc = &nsproxy->time_ns_for_children->ns; + struct time_namespace *ns = to_time_ns(nsc); + + if (nsproxy->time_ns == nsproxy->time_ns_for_children) + return 0; + + get_time_ns(ns); + put_time_ns(nsproxy->time_ns); + nsproxy->time_ns = ns; + ns->initialized = true;Isn't that one initialized already?
When we discussed time namespaces last year, we decided that clock offsets can be set only before any task enters a namespace. When a namespace is created, ns->initialized is set to false. When a task enters the namespace, ns->initialized is set to true. Namespace clock offsets can be changed only if ns->initialized is false. A new task can be forked to a specified time namespace or it can call setns, so we set ns->initialized to true in timens_on_fork and timens_install.
quoted
+ + return 0; +} + +static struct user_namespace *timens_owner(struct ns_common *ns) +{ + return to_time_ns(ns)->user_ns; +} + +const struct proc_ns_operations timens_operations = { + .name = "time", + .type = CLONE_NEWTIME, + .get = timens_get, + .put = timens_put, + .install = timens_install, + .owner = timens_owner, +}; + +const struct proc_ns_operations timens_for_children_operations = { + .name = "time_for_children", + .type = CLONE_NEWTIME, + .get = timens_for_children_get, + .put = timens_put, + .install = timens_install, + .owner = timens_owner, +}; + +struct time_namespace init_time_ns = { + .kref = KREF_INIT(3), + .user_ns = &init_user_ns, + .ns.inum = PROC_TIME_INIT_INO, + .ns.ops = &timens_operations, +};Inconsisten formatting. The above static initializers are nicely tabular. This on not.
Will fix. Thanks. Thanks, Andrei
Thanks, tglx