Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags

From
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date
2019-07-12 15:00:59
Also in
linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-kselftest, linux-mips, linux-s390, linux-sh, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux
Reply to
Al Viro, 2019-07-12
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:25:53PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
	if (flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH) {
		nd->root = nd->path;
		if (!(flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
			path_get(&nd->root);
		else
			nd->root_seq = nd->seq;
BTW, this assignment is needed for LOOKUP_RCU case.  Without it
you are pretty much guaranteed that lazy pathwalk will fail,
when it comes to complete_walk().

Speaking of which, what would happen if LOOKUP_ROOT/LOOKUP_BENEATH
combination would someday get passed?
Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 7 authors, last reply 2019-07-19
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help