Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 3 authors, 2019-06-13

Re: Regression for MS_MOVE on kernel v5.1

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2019-06-13 15:47:52
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

[Adding Eric to the cc list since he implemented MNT_LOCKED]

Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The commit changes the internal logic to lock mounts when propagating
mounts (user+)mount namespaces and - I believe - causes do_mount_move()
to fail at:
You mean 'do_move_mount()'.
quoted
if (old->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCKED)
        goto out;

If that's indeed the case we should either revert this commit (reverts
cleanly, just tested it) or find a fix.
Hmm.. I'm not entirely sure of the logic here, and just looking at
that commit 3bd045cc9c4b ("separate copying and locking mount tree on
cross-userns copies") doesn't make me go "Ahh" either.

Al? My gut feel is that we need to just revert, since this was in 5.1
and it's getting reasonably late in 5.2 too. But maybe you go "guys,
don't be silly, this is easily fixed with this one-liner".
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help