On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 5:44 AM Vlastimil Babka [off-list ref] wrote:
On 4/25/19 2:14 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
quoted
Please cc linux-api for user visible API proposals (now done). Keep the
rest of the email intact for reference.
On Wed 24-04-19 14:10:39, Matthew Garrett wrote:
quoted
From: Matthew Garrett <redacted>
Applications that hold secrets and wish to avoid them leaking can use
mlock() to prevent the page from being pushed out to swap and
MADV_DONTDUMP to prevent it from being included in core dumps. Applications
So, do we really need a new madvise() flag and VMA flag, or can we just
infer this page clearing from mlock+MADV_DONTDUMP being both applied?
I think the combination would probably imply that this is the
behaviour you want, but I'm a little concerned about changing the
semantics given the corner cases described earlier in the thread. If
we can figure those out in a way that won't break any existing code, I
could buy this.