Re: [PATCH for 5.1 3/3] rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected cpus
flat view
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date: 2019-04-19 18:35:05
Also in:
linux-kselftest, lkml
----- On Apr 19, 2019, at 9:42 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:
----- On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:55 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:quoted
----- On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:quoted
----- On Apr 19, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org wrote:quoted
* Mathieu Desnoyers [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On smaller systems, running a test with 200 threads can take a long time on machines with smaller number of CPUs. Detect the number of online cpus at test runtime, and multiply that by 6 to have 6 rseq threads per cpu preempting each other. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted> Cc: Joel Fernandes <redacted> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Dave Watson <redacted> Cc: Will Deacon <redacted> Cc: Andi Kleen <redacted> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Chris Lameter <redacted> Cc: Russell King <redacted> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <redacted> Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <redacted> Cc: Paul Turner <redacted> Cc: Boqun Feng <redacted> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ben Maurer <redacted> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.shb/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh index 3acd6d75ff9f..e426304fd4a0 100755--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ #!/bin/bash # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ or MIT +NR_CPUS=`grep '^processor' /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l` + EXTRA_ARGS=${@} OLDIFS="$IFS"@@ -28,15 +30,16 @@ IFS="$OLDIFS" REPS=1000 SLOW_REPS=100 +NR_THREADS=$((6*${NR_CPUS})) function do_tests() { local i=0 while [ "$i" -lt "${#TEST_LIST[@]}" ]; do echo "Running test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}" - ./param_test ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1 + ./param_test ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} -t ${NR_THREADS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS}|| exit 1 echo "Running compare-twice test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}" - ./param_test_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1 + ./param_test_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} -t ${NR_THREADS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1 let "i++" done }BTW., when trying to build the rseq self-tests I get this build failure: dagon:~/tip/tools/testing/selftests/rseq> make gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I./ -I../../../../usr/include/ -L./ -Wl,-rpath=./ -shared -fPIC rseq.c -lpthread -o /home/mingo/tip/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/librseq.so gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I./ -I../../../../usr/include/ -L./ -Wl,-rpath=./ basic_test.c -lpthread -lrseq -o /home/mingo/tip/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_test gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I./ -I../../../../usr/include/ -L./ -Wl,-rpath=./ basic_percpu_ops_test.c -lpthread -lrseq -o /home/mingo/tip/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccuHTWnZ.o: in function `rseq_cmpeqv_storev': /home/mingo/tip/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/./rseq-x86.h:84: undefined reference to `.L8' /usr/bin/ld: /home/mingo/tip/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/./rseq-x86.h:84: undefined reference to `.L49' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccuHTWnZ.o: in function `rseq_cmpnev_storeoffp_load': /home/mingo/tip/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/./rseq-x86.h:141: undefined reference to `.L57' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccuHTWnZ.o:(__rseq_failure+0x8): undefined reference to `.L8' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccuHTWnZ.o:(__rseq_failure+0x14): undefined reference to `.L49' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccuHTWnZ.o:(__rseq_failure+0x20): undefined reference to `.L55' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [Makefile:22: /home/mingo/tip/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test] Error 1 Is this a known problem, or do I miss something from my build environment perhaps? Vanilla 64-bit Ubuntu 18.10 (Cosmic).It works fine with gcc-7 (gcc version 7.3.0 (Ubuntu 7.3.0-16ubuntu3)) but indeed I get the same failure with gcc-8 (gcc version 8.0.1 20180414 (experimental) [trunk revision 259383] (Ubuntu 8-20180414-1ubuntu2)). Thanks for reporting! I will investigate.It looks like gcc-8 optimize away the target of asm goto labels when there are more than one of them on x86-64. I'll try to come up with a simpler reproducer.It appears to be related to gcc-8 mishandling combination of asm goto and thread-local storage input operands on x86-64. Here is a simple reproducer: __thread int var; static int fct(void) { asm goto ( "jmp %l[testlabel]\n\t" : : [var] "m" (var) : : testlabel); return 0; testlabel:
FWIW, if I add an empty
asm volatile ("");
here after the label, gcc-8 -O2 builds "something" which is
a bogus assembler (an endless loop) :
main:
.LFB24:
.cfi_startproc
.L2:
subq $8, %rsp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
#APP
# 6 "test-asm-goto.c" 1
jmp .L2
# 0 "" 2
#NO_APP
movl %fs:var@tpoff, %edx
leaq .LC0(%rip), %rsi
movl $1, %edi
xorl %eax, %eax
call __printf_chk@PLT
xorl %eax, %eax
addq $8, %rsp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
ret
.cfi_endproc
Thoughts ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
return 1;
}
int main()
{
return fct();
}
building with gcc-7 -O2 is fine. Building with gcc-8 -O0 is
fine too. Building with gcc-8 -O1 and -O2 fails with:
/tmp/ccuXTFfs.o: In function `main':
test-asm-goto.c:(.text.startup+0x1): undefined reference to `.L2'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
With gcc-7 -O2, the assembly of main has the .L2 label:
main:
.LFB1:
.cfi_startproc
#APP
# 5 "test-asm-goto.c" 1
jmp .L2
# 0 "" 2
#NO_APP
.L4:
.L3:
xorl %eax, %eax
ret
.L2:
movl $1, %eax
ret
.cfi_endproc
However, with gcc-8 -O2, it's missing:
main:
.LFB1:
.cfi_startproc
.L3:
#APP
# 5 "test-asm-goto.c" 1
jmp .L2
# 0 "" 2
#NO_APP
xorl %eax, %eax
ret
.cfi_endproc
It looks like we have a compiler issue. :-/
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com-- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com