Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2019-03-18 12:57:00
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-mips, lkml, netdev, sparclinux
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:25 AM Florian Weimer [off-list ref] wrote:
* Arnd Bergmann:quoted
Should we just remove __kernel_fd_set from the exported headers and define the internal fd_set directly in include/linux/types.h? (Adding the folks from the old thread to Cc).The type is used in the sanitizers, but incorrectly. They assume that FD_SETSIZE is always 1024. (The existence of __kernel_fd_set is itself somewhat questionable because it leads to such bugs.) Moving around the type could cause a build failure in the sanitizers, but I'm not entirely clear how the UAPI headers are included there.
It looks like sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc includes linux/posix_types.h to ensure that __kernel_fd_set is the same size as __sanitizer___kernel_fd_set, and then it uses the latter afterwards. What I don't see here is what kind of operation is actually done on the data, I only see a cast to void. If libsanitizer actually does anything interesting here, we should definitely fix it to use the correct size, especially since this is actually something that can trigger a buffer overflow in subtle ways when used carelessly. See for example [1], which we still have not addressed (I suspect we actually need to have glibc use __kernel_long_t instead of 'long int' here, but that is a separate issue, and not overly important given how few users there are on x32). For this specific use (and probably others like it), renaming the fds_bits member to __kernel_fds_bits or something like that would keep user space still compiling. That would only break if someone was using __kernel_fd_set, and actually doing bit operations on it. glibc uses '__fds_bits' unless __USE_XOPEN is set, so maybe we should use use that name unconditionally.
Otherwise, I couldn't find any uses.