Re: [PATCH 06/19] io_uring: add fsync support
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Date: 2019-02-08 22:37:01
Also in:
linux-block
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:34 PM Jens Axboe [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Add a new fsync opcode, which either syncs a range if one is passed, or the whole file if the offset and length fields are both cleared to zero. A flag is provided to use fdatasync semantics, that is only force out metadata which is required to retrieve the file data, but not others like metadata. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> ---
[...]
+static int io_fsync(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
+ bool force_nonblock)
+{
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+ loff_t sqe_off = READ_ONCE(sqe->off);
+ loff_t sqe_len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
+ loff_t end = sqe_off + sqe_len;
+ unsigned fsync_flags;
+ struct file *file;
+ int ret, fd;
+
+ /* fsync always requires a blocking context */
+ if (force_nonblock)
+ return -EAGAIN;
+
+ if (unlikely(sqe->addr || sqe->ioprio))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ fsync_flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->fsync_flags);
+ if (unlikely(fsync_flags & ~IORING_FSYNC_DATASYNC))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ fd = READ_ONCE(sqe->fd);
+ file = fget(fd);This always runs on the workqueue, right? Is it possible to call fget() on a workqueue?
+ if (unlikely(!file)) + return -EBADF; + + ret = vfs_fsync_range(file, sqe_off, end > 0 ? end : LLONG_MAX, + fsync_flags & IORING_FSYNC_DATASYNC); + + fput(file); + io_cqring_add_event(ctx, sqe->user_data, ret, 0); + io_free_req(req); + return 0; +}
-- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>