Thread (63 messages) 63 messages, 5 authors, 2019-02-11

Re: [PATCH 12/18] io_uring: add support for pre-mapped user IO buffers

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2019-01-29 22:56:35
Also in: linux-block

On 1/29/19 3:44 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:27 PM Jens Axboe [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
If we have fixed user buffers, we can map them into the kernel when we
setup the io_context. That avoids the need to do get_user_pages() for
each and every IO.

To utilize this feature, the application must call io_uring_register()
after having setup an io_uring context, passing in
IORING_REGISTER_BUFFERS as the opcode. The argument must be a pointer
to an iovec array, and the nr_args should contain how many iovecs the
application wishes to map.

If successful, these buffers are now mapped into the kernel, eligible
for IO. To use these fixed buffers, the application must use the
IORING_OP_READ_FIXED and IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED opcodes, and then
set sqe->index to the desired buffer index. sqe->addr..sqe->addr+seq->len
must point to somewhere inside the indexed buffer.

The application may register buffers throughout the lifetime of the
io_uring context. It can call io_uring_register() with
IORING_UNREGISTER_BUFFERS as the opcode to unregister the current set of
buffers, and then register a new set. The application need not
unregister buffers explicitly before shutting down the io_uring context.
[...]
quoted
+static int io_import_fixed(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int rw,
+                          const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
+                          struct iov_iter *iter)
+{
+       size_t len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
+       struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu;
+       int buf_index, index;
+       size_t offset;
+       u64 buf_addr;
+
+       /* attempt to use fixed buffers without having provided iovecs */
+       if (unlikely(!ctx->user_bufs))
+               return -EFAULT;
+
+       buf_index = READ_ONCE(sqe->buf_index);
+       if (unlikely(buf_index >= ctx->nr_user_bufs))
+               return -EFAULT;
Nit: If you make the local copy of buf_index unsigned, it is slightly
easier to see that this code is correct. (I know, it has to be
positive anyway because the value in shared memory is a u16.)
I'll definitely fit, but I can make it unsigned.
quoted
+       index = array_index_nospec(buf_index, ctx->sq_entries);
This looks weird. Did you mean s/ctx->sq_entries/ctx->nr_user_bufs/?
I did, too much copy/paste for that one. Fixed.
quoted
+       imu = &ctx->user_bufs[index];
+       buf_addr = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
+       if (buf_addr < imu->ubuf || buf_addr + len > imu->ubuf + imu->len)
This can wrap around if `buf_addr` or `len` is very big, right? Then
you e.g. get past the first check because `buf_addr` is sufficiently
big, and get past the second check because `buf_addr + len` wraps
around and becomes small.
Good point. I wonder if we have a verification helper for something like
this?
quoted
+               return -EFAULT;
+
+       /*
+        * May not be a start of buffer, set size appropriately
+        * and advance us to the beginning.
+        */
+       offset = buf_addr - imu->ubuf;
+       iov_iter_bvec(iter, rw, imu->bvec, imu->nr_bvecs, offset + len);
+       if (offset)
+               iov_iter_advance(iter, offset);
+       return 0;
+}
+
 static int io_import_iovec(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int rw,
                           const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe, struct iovec **iovec,
                           struct iov_iter *iter)
 {
        void __user *buf = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr));
        size_t sqe_len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
+       int opcode;
+
+       opcode = READ_ONCE(sqe->opcode);
+       if (opcode == IORING_OP_READ_FIXED ||
+           opcode == IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED) {
+               ssize_t ret = io_import_fixed(ctx, rw, sqe, iter);
+               *iovec = NULL;
+               return ret;
+       }
[...]
quoted
+static inline bool io_sqe_needs_user(const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
+{
+       return !(sqe->opcode == IORING_OP_READ_FIXED ||
+                sqe->opcode == IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED);
+}
This still looks racy to me?
I didn't change it because the below one you quoted below
(io_sq_wq_submit_work()) is using a local copy, but we do need it for
for the SQPOLL io_sq_thread() case. I'll get that one fixed up.

I suspect the easiest fix is to ensure that io_sq_thread() copies the
sqe.
quoted
+static int io_copy_iov(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct iovec *dst,
+                      void __user *arg, unsigned index)
+{
This function doesn't actually use the "ctx" parameter, right? You
might want to remove it.
It should just use ctx->compat for this check, we're now only calling
in_compat_syscall() when we setup the ctx. This keeps it all in one
spot.
quoted
+       struct iovec __user *src;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+       if (in_compat_syscall()) {
+               struct compat_iovec __user *ciovs;
+               struct compat_iovec ciov;
+
+               ciovs = (struct compat_iovec __user *) arg;
+               if (copy_from_user(&ciov, &ciovs[index], sizeof(ciov)))
+                       return -EFAULT;
+
+               dst->iov_base = (void __user *) (unsigned long) ciov.iov_base;
+               dst->iov_len = ciov.iov_len;
+               return 0;
+       }
+#endif
+       src = (struct iovec __user *) arg;
+       if (copy_from_user(dst, &src[index], sizeof(*dst)))
+               return -EFAULT;
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int io_sqe_buffer_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
+                                 unsigned nr_args)
+{
+       struct vm_area_struct **vmas = NULL;
+       struct page **pages = NULL;
+       int i, j, got_pages = 0;
+       int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+       if (ctx->user_bufs)
+               return -EBUSY;
+       if (!nr_args || nr_args > UIO_MAXIOV)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       ctx->user_bufs = kcalloc(nr_args, sizeof(struct io_mapped_ubuf),
+                                       GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!ctx->user_bufs)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       if (!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
+               ctx->user = get_uid(current_user());
+
+       for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
+               struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu = &ctx->user_bufs[i];
+               unsigned long off, start, end, ubuf;
+               int pret, nr_pages;
+               struct iovec iov;
+               size_t size;
+
+               ret = io_copy_iov(ctx, &iov, arg, i);
+               if (ret)
+                       break;
+
+               /*
+                * Don't impose further limits on the size and buffer
+                * constraints here, we'll -EINVAL later when IO is
+                * submitted if they are wrong.
+                */
+               ret = -EFAULT;
+               if (!iov.iov_base)
+                       goto err;
+
+               /* arbitrary limit, but we need something */
+               if (iov.iov_len > SZ_1G)
+                       goto err;
You might also want to check for iov_len==0? Otherwise, if iov_base
isn't page-aligned, the following code might grab a reference to one
page even though the iov covers zero pages, that'd be kinda weird.
Good catch, will do.
quoted
+               ubuf = (unsigned long) iov.iov_base;
+               end = (ubuf + iov.iov_len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+               start = ubuf >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+               nr_pages = end - start;
+
+               ret = io_account_mem(ctx, nr_pages);
+               if (ret)
+                       goto err;
+
+               if (!pages || nr_pages > got_pages) {
+                       kfree(vmas);
+                       kfree(pages);
+                       pages = kmalloc_array(nr_pages, sizeof(struct page *),
+                                               GFP_KERNEL);
+                       vmas = kmalloc_array(nr_pages,
+                                       sizeof(struct vma_area_struct *),
+                                       GFP_KERNEL);
+                       if (!pages || !vmas) {
+                               io_unaccount_mem(ctx, nr_pages);
+                               goto err;
+                       }
+                       got_pages = nr_pages;
+               }
+
+               imu->bvec = kmalloc_array(nr_pages, sizeof(struct bio_vec),
+                                               GFP_KERNEL);
+               if (!imu->bvec) {
+                       io_unaccount_mem(ctx, nr_pages);
+                       goto err;
+               }
+
+               down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
Is there a reason why you're using down_write() and not down_read()?
As far as I can tell, down_read() is all you need...
Looks like you are right, I'll change that.
quoted
+               pret = get_user_pages_longterm(ubuf, nr_pages, FOLL_WRITE,
+                                               pages, vmas);
+               if (pret == nr_pages) {
+                       /* don't support file backed memory */
+                       for (j = 0; j < nr_pages; j++) {
+                               struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmas[j];
+
+                               if (vma->vm_file) {
+                                       ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+                                       break;
+                               }
+                       }
Are you intentionally doing the check for vma->vm_file instead of
calling GUP with FOLL_ANON, which would automatically verify
vma->vm_ops==NULL for you using vma_is_anonymous()? FOLL_ANON is what
procfs uses to avoid blocking on page faults when reading remote
process memory via /proc/*/{cmdline,environ}. I don't entirely
understand the motivation for this check, so I can't really tell
whether FOLL_ANON would do the job.
I wasn't aware of FOLL_ANON, it looks exactly like what I need. All I
care about is the mapping being anon, and not file backed. If FOLL_ANON
ensures me that (or fails), then that'll kill this vma checking code.
Thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help