Re: [PATCH 05/18] Add io_uring IO interface
flat view
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Date: 2019-01-29 02:21:29
Also in:
linux-block, linux-man
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 2:07 AM Jann Horn [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:35 PM Jens Axboe [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The submission queue (SQ) and completion queue (CQ) rings are shared between the application and the kernel. This eliminates the need to copy data back and forth to submit and complete IO.[...]quoted
+static bool io_get_sqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct sqe_submit *s) +{ + struct io_sq_ring *ring = ctx->sq_ring; + unsigned head; + + /* + * The cached sq head (or cq tail) serves two purposes: + * + * 1) allows us to batch the cost of updating the user visible + * head updates. + * 2) allows the kernel side to track the head on its own, even + * though the application is the one updating it. + */ + head = ctx->cached_sq_head; + smp_rmb(); + if (head == READ_ONCE(ring->r.tail)) + return false; + + head = ring->array[head & ctx->sq_mask]; + if (head < ctx->sq_entries) { + s->index = head; + s->sqe = &ctx->sq_sqes[head];ring->array can be mapped writable into userspace, right? If so: This looks like a double-read issue; the compiler might assume that ring->array is not modified concurrently and perform separate memory accesses for the "if (head < ctx->sq_entries)" check and the "&ctx->sq_sqes[head]" computation. Please use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() for all accesses to memory that userspace could concurrently modify in a malicious way. There have been some pretty severe security bugs caused by missing READ_ONCE() annotations around accesses to shared memory; see, for example, https://www.blackhat.com/docs/us-16/materials/us-16-Wilhelm-Xenpwn-Breaking-Paravirtualized-Devices.pdf . Slides 35-48 show how the code "switch (op->cmd)", where "op" is a pointer to shared memory, allowed an attacker to break out of a Xen virtual machine because the compiler generated multiple memory accesses.
Oh, actually, it's even worse (comments with "//" added by me):
io_sq_thread() does this:
do {
// sqes[i].sqe is pointer to shared memory, result of
// io_sqe_needs_user() is unreliable
if (all_fixed && io_sqe_needs_user(sqes[i].sqe))
all_fixed = false;
i++;
if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(sqes))
break;
} while (io_get_sqring(ctx, &sqes[i]));
// sqes[...].sqe are pointers to shared memory
io_commit_sqring(ctx);
/* Unless all new commands are FIXED regions, grab mm */
if (!all_fixed && !cur_mm) {
mm_fault = !mmget_not_zero(ctx->sqo_mm);
if (!mm_fault) {
use_mm(ctx->sqo_mm);
cur_mm = ctx->sqo_mm;
}
}
inflight += io_submit_sqes(ctx, sqes, i, mm_fault);
Then the shared memory pointers go into io_submit_sqes():
static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct sqe_submit *sqes,
unsigned int nr, bool mm_fault)
{
struct io_submit_state state, *statep = NULL;
int ret, i, submitted = 0;
// sqes[...].sqe are pointers to shared memory
[...]
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
if (unlikely(mm_fault))
ret = -EFAULT;
else
ret = io_submit_sqe(ctx, &sqes[i], statep);
[...]
}
[...]
}
And on into io_submit_sqe():
static int io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct sqe_submit *s,
struct io_submit_state *state)
{
[...]
ret = __io_submit_sqe(ctx, req, s, true, state);
[...]
}
And there it gets interesting:
static int __io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
struct sqe_submit *s, bool force_nonblock,
struct io_submit_state *state)
{
// s->sqe is a pointer to shared memory
const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = s->sqe;
// sqe is a pointer to shared memory
ssize_t ret;
if (unlikely(s->index >= ctx->sq_entries))
return -EINVAL;
req->user_data = sqe->user_data;
ret = -EINVAL;
// switch() on read from shared memory, potential instruction pointer
// control
switch (sqe->opcode) {
[...]
case IORING_OP_READV:
if (unlikely(sqe->buf_index))
return -EINVAL;
ret = io_read(req, sqe, force_nonblock, state);
break;
[...]
case IORING_OP_READ_FIXED:
ret = io_read(req, sqe, force_nonblock, state);
break;
[...]
}
[...]
}
On into io_read():
static ssize_t io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
bool force_nonblock, struct io_submit_state *state)
{
[...]
// sqe is a pointer to shared memory
ret = io_prep_rw(req, sqe, force_nonblock, state);
[...]
}
And then io_prep_rw() does multiple reads even in the source code:
static int io_prep_rw(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
bool force_nonblock, struct io_submit_state *state)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct kiocb *kiocb = &req->rw;
int ret;
// sqe is a pointer to shared memory
// double-read of sqe->flags, see end of function
if (sqe->flags & IOSQE_FIXED_FILE) {
// double-read of sqe->fd for the bounds check and the
array access, potential OOB pointer read
if (unlikely(!ctx->user_files || sqe->fd >= ctx->nr_user_files))
return -EBADF;
kiocb->ki_filp = ctx->user_files[sqe->fd];
req->flags |= REQ_F_FIXED_FILE;
} else {
kiocb->ki_filp = io_file_get(state, sqe->fd);
}
if (unlikely(!kiocb->ki_filp))
return -EBADF;
kiocb->ki_pos = sqe->off;
kiocb->ki_flags = iocb_flags(kiocb->ki_filp);
kiocb->ki_hint = ki_hint_validate(file_write_hint(kiocb->ki_filp));
// three reads of sqe->ioprio, bypassable capability check
if (sqe->ioprio) {
ret = ioprio_check_cap(sqe->ioprio);
if (ret)
goto out_fput;
kiocb->ki_ioprio = sqe->ioprio;
} else
kiocb->ki_ioprio = get_current_ioprio();
[...]
return 0;
out_fput:
// double-read of sqe->flags, changed value can lead to
unbalanced refcount
if (!(sqe->flags & IOSQE_FIXED_FILE))
io_file_put(state, kiocb->ki_filp);
return ret;
}
Please create a local copy of the request before parsing it to keep
the data from changing under you. Additionally, it might make sense to
annotate every pointer to shared memory with a comment, or something
like that, to ensure that anyone looking at the code can immediately
see for which pointers special caution is required on access.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>