Re: Official Linux system wrapper library?
flat view
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Date: 2018-12-10 23:32:47
Also in:
lkml
On 12/10/18 9:39 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On 12/10/18 11:27 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:quoted
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 20:38:56 -0800 Randy Dunlap [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 11/12/18 8:08 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:quoted
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 18:36:30 -0800 Greg KH [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
We should have a checklist. That's a great idea. Now to find someone to write it... :)Do we think the LPC session might have the right people to create such a thing? If so, I can try to put together a coherent presentation of the result.Hi, Did anything ever happen with this syscall checklist suggestion?No, we really didn't have the right people around to do that, unfortunately.We already have Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst. The documentation there is quite thorough. It lists things that people commonly forget e.g. email linux-api@vger.kernel.org. Would it be acceptable to attempt to collate per-libc information into the adding-syscalls.rst under a new section called: "Integration with libc"
I think that updates to adding-syscalls.rst would be sufficient, instead of having a new/separate syscalls-checklist file. thanks, -- ~Randy