Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 4 authors, 2018-12-25

Re: [PATCH v2] signal: add procfd_signal() syscall

From: Florian Weimer <hidden>
Date: 2018-12-06 18:56:54
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-man, lkml

* Andy Lutomirski:
quoted
I suppose that's fine.  Or alternatively, when thread group support is
added, introduce a flag that applications have to use to enable it, so
that they can probe for support by checking support for the flag.

I wouldn't be opposed to a new system call like this either:

 int procfd_open (pid_t thread_group, pid_t thread_id, unsigned flags);

But I think this is frowned upon on the kernel side.
I have no problem with it, except that I think it shouldn’t return an
fd that can be used for proc filesystem access.
Oh no, my intention was that it would just be used with  *_send_signal
and related functions.

Thanks,
Florian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help