Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 6 authors, 2018-11-26

Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust

From: Joel Fernandes <hidden>
Date: 2018-11-20 18:40:05
Also in: linux-kselftest, linux-mm, lkml

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by
Andy [2].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781@google.com/ (local)
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74@amacapital.net/ (local)

Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Fixes: 5e653c2923fd ("mm: Add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd")
What tree is that commit in?  Can we not just fold this in?
It is in linux-next. Could we keep both commits so we have the history?

thanks,

 - Joel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help