Re: rseq system call incompletely wired up in microblaze

Hi Mathieu,

On 14.10.2018 18:46, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

Hi Michal,

I notice the following commit went into 4.18:

commit 54b0a2011dfcd2e3fe2c28062694fbbe3eb377a3
Author: Michal Simek [off-list ref]
Date:   Thu Jun 14 08:24:39 2018 +0200

    microblaze: Add new syscalls io_pgetevents and rseq
    
    Wire up new syscalls io_pgetevents and rseq.
    
    Signed-off-by: Michal Simek [off-list ref]

It adds the rseq system call to the microblaze syscall list, but
does not add the required hooks in the architecture code, nor does
it select HAVE_RSEQ. So effectively, even though sys_rseq is reserved
on microblaze, it currently always returns ENOSYS.

Is your intent to simply reserve the system call number, or to
also get rseq to work on microblaze ?

Yes. my indentation is allocate syscall numbers for all these new
syscalls because it takes some time when new syscalls numbers are
propagated to toolchain builds.
I can't see a problem if ENOSYS is returned because it is proper
reaction when syscall is not implemented.

Thanks,
Michal