Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] prctl: add PR_[GS]ET_KILLABLE
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2018-09-06 22:42:12
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:40:21 +0200 Jürg Billeter [off-list ref] wrote:
PR_SET_KILLABLE clears the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE flag. This allows CLONE_NEWPID tasks to restore normal signal behavior, opting out of the special signal protection for init processes. This prctl does not allow setting the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE flag, only clearing. The SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE flag, which is implicitly set for tasks cloned with CLONE_NEWPID, has the effect of ignoring all signals (from userspace) if the corresponding handler is set to SIG_DFL. The only exceptions are SIGKILL and SIGSTOP and they are only accepted if raised from an ancestor namespace. SIGINT, SIGQUIT and SIGTSTP are used in job control for ^C, ^\, ^Z. While a task with the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE flag could install handlers for these signals, this is not sufficient to implement a shell that uses CLONE_NEWPID for child processes: * As SIGSTOP is ignored when raised from the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE process itself, it's not possible to implement the stop action in a custom SIGTSTP handler. * Many applications do not install handlers for these signals and thus, job control won't work properly with unmodified applications. There are other scenarios besides job control in a shell where applications rely on the default actions as described in signal(7) and PID isolation may be useful. This new prctl makes the signal protection for "init" processes optional, without breaking backward compatibility.
This one is above my pay grade. Eric & Oleg: could you please provide input?