Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: proc/pid/smaps_rollup: convert to single value seq_file
From: Vlastimil Babka <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-25 06:53:53
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
I moved the reply to this thread since the "added to -mm tree" notification Alexey replied to in <20180724182908.GD27053@avx2> has reduced CC list and is not linked to the patch postings. On 07/24/2018 08:29 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:55:48PM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:quoted
The patch titled Subject: mm: /proc/pid/smaps_rollup: convert to single value seq_file has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is mm-proc-pid-smaps_rollup-convert-to-single-value-seq_file.patchquoted
Subject: mm: /proc/pid/smaps_rollup: convert to single value seq_file The /proc/pid/smaps_rollup file is currently implemented via the m_start/m_next/m_stop seq_file iterators shared with the other maps files, that iterate over vma's. However, the rollup file doesn't print anything for each vma, only accumulate the stats.What I don't understand why keep seq_ops then and not do all the work in ->show hook. Currently /proc/*/smaps_rollup is at ~500 bytes so with minimum 1 page seq buffer, no buffer resizing is possible.
Hmm IIUC seq_file also provides the buffer and handles feeding the data from there to the user process, which might have called read() with a smaller buffer than that. So I would rather not avoid the seq_file infrastructure. Or you're saying it could be converted to single_open()? Maybe, with more work.
quoted
+static int show_smaps_rollup(struct seq_file *m, void *v) +{ + struct proc_maps_private *priv = m->private; + struct mem_size_stats *mss = priv->rollup; + struct vm_area_struct *vma; + + /* + * We might be called multiple times when e.g. the seq buffer + * overflows. Gather the stats only once.It doesn't!
Because the buffer is 1 page and the data is ~500 bytes as you said above? Agreed, but I wouldn't want to depend on data not growing in the future or the initial buffer not getting smaller. I could extend the comment that this is theoretical for now?
quoted
+ if (!mss->finished) { + for (vma = priv->mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) { + smap_gather_stats(vma, mss); + mss->last_vma_end = vma->vm_end; } - last_vma = !m_next_vma(priv, vma); - } else { - rollup_mode = false; - memset(&mss_stack, 0, sizeof(mss_stack)); - mss = &mss_stack;